Vendors
Brands & Sources Directory
A curated 2026 list of research peptide vendors. Reputation tiers reflect synthesized community feedback, public COA practices, and shipping reliability — not endorsement.
Research chemicals only. Not for human use. For research and educational purposes only. Always do your own due diligence and consult qualified professionals.
Showing 32 of 32 vendors
Amino Asylum
United States · est. ~2020
Pros
- +Wide catalog including hard-to-find peptides
- +Frequent third-party COAs published
- +Active community presence
Cons
- −Domestic shipping has had occasional payment friction
- −Some users report inconsistent vial fill volume
Limitless Life
United States · est. ~2019
Pros
- +Pharmacy-grade purity (>99 % HPLC) on most peptides
- +GMP-style packaging with tamper seals
- +Consistent batch-to-batch reports
Cons
- −Higher pricing tier
- −Account/membership required for full access
Core Peptides
United States · est. ~2017
Pros
- +Long-running vendor with stable reputation
- +Reasonable pricing
- +Decent purity reports
Cons
- −Limited sterility/endotoxin reporting
- −UI feels dated
Hyperion Peptides
United States · est. ~2021
Pros
- +Very high QA standards
- +Detailed multi-method COAs (HPLC, MS, endotoxin, residual solvents)
- +Beautiful packaging
Cons
- −Smaller catalog
- −Premium pricing
- −Limited stock cycles
Particle Peptides
EU / United Kingdom · est. ~2020
Pros
- +Reliable EU-domestic option
- +Customs-friendly fulfillment
- +Solid customer support
Cons
- −Catalog smaller than US peers
- −Higher EU pricing
GeoPeptides
United States · est. ~2018
Pros
- +Frequent promotions
- +Decent COAs
- +Quick fulfillment
Cons
- −QC variance reported across some lots
- −Limited support
Pharma Lab Global
EU / United Kingdom · est. ~2017
Pros
- +Massive catalog
- +Cheap pricing
- +Worldwide shipping
Cons
- −Inconsistent purity reports across batches
- −Customs seizures possible internationally
- −Mixed community feedback
SwissChems
Switzerland (international) · est. ~2016
Pros
- +Long history
- +Decent purity
- +Good packaging
- +Worldwide shipping
Cons
- −Pricing higher than US peers
- −Some shipments delayed at customs
Ascendis Science
United States · est. ~2022
Pros
- +Newer GMP-style vendor
- +Cold-chain shipping
- +Detailed batch documentation
Cons
- −Premium pricing
- −Smaller catalog
DIY Research Co
United States · est. ~2024
Pros
- +Aggressive pricing
- +Active social media presence
Cons
- −Newer vendor with limited track record
- −Sparse third-party COAs
Pure Rawz
United States · est. ~2018
Pros
- +Wide catalog covering peptides + research compounds
- +Published HPLC COAs by lot
- +Consistent fulfillment
Cons
- −Pricing in the middle tier
- −Customer service can be slow during sales
Peptide Sciences
United States · est. ~2014
Pros
- +One of the longest-running US research-peptide vendors
- +Clean published COAs
- +Wide scientific catalog beyond just biohacker peptides
Cons
- −Premium pricing
- −International availability limited
Sports Tech Labs
United States · est. ~2018
Pros
- +Athlete-focused catalog (recovery + performance peptides)
- +Reliable shipping
- +Decent COA transparency
Cons
- −QA more sport-supplement-grade than pharma-grade
- −Smaller specialty selection
Modern Aminos
United States · est. ~2021
Pros
- +Approachable UI, beginner-friendly
- +Solid HPLC purity on common peptides
- +Frequent promotions
Cons
- −Catalog leans toward popular peptides — niche compounds missing
- −Newer than top-tier peers
BioTech Peptides
United States · est. ~2017
Pros
- +Long-running mid-tier vendor
- +Decent purity track record
- +Stable fulfillment
Cons
- −Limited published sterility/endotoxin data
- −Older site UX
Pinnacle Peptides
United States · est. ~2016
Pros
- +Long history
- +Reasonable pricing
- +Consistent batch quality on common compounds
Cons
- −Sparse modern COA disclosure compared to newer premium vendors
Behemoth Labz
United States · est. ~2019
Pros
- +Broad catalog including SARMs and peptides
- +Aggressive promotional pricing
Cons
- −Mixed user feedback on consistency
- −QC reports vary by lot
- −Customer service complaints common
Olympus Labz
United States · est. ~2023
Pros
- +Modern site UX
- +Active promotional pricing
Cons
- −Limited public history
- −Sparse third-party COAs
Phenom Pharma
United States · est. ~2020
Pros
- +Large catalog spanning peptides + research chemicals
- +Frequent sales
Cons
- −Inconsistent QC reports across lots
- −Mixed community feedback
Sterling Peptides
United States · est. ~2023
Pros
- +Cleaner site presentation
- +Approachable pricing
Cons
- −Short track record
- −Limited public COA history
Western Biotech
United States · est. ~2019
Pros
- +Specialty / niche peptides occasionally available
- +Decent COA transparency
Cons
- −Smaller catalog
- −Lower brand recognition than peers
North Coast Peptides
United States · est. ~2020
Pros
- +Mid-tier pricing with reasonable QC
- +Active community presence
Cons
- −Catalog rotates frequently — popular peptides occasionally out of stock
BlueSky Peptide
United States · est. ~2018
Pros
- +Long history in the US market
- +Frequent discount cycles
Cons
- −Inconsistent COA depth
- −Quality reports vary by batch
Direct SARMs UK
United Kingdom · est. ~2017
Pros
- +UK-domestic option for EU/UK buyers
- +Long history
- +Decent QC documentation
Cons
- −Pricing higher than US peers
- −Brexit-era customs adds friction for non-UK EU buyers
Peptide Pros UK
United Kingdom · est. ~2019
Pros
- +UK-based fulfillment
- +Decent COA transparency
- +Reasonable pricing for the region
Cons
- −Smaller catalog than US flagships
- −Limited cold-chain options
Optimum Peptides UK
United Kingdom · est. ~2020
Pros
- +Approachable site UX
- +UK-domestic for fast delivery
Cons
- −Smaller catalog focused on common peptides
- −QA documentation could be deeper
Bio-Peptide Australia
Australia · est. ~2019
Pros
- +Domestic Australian fulfillment
- +Avoids brutal AU customs intercept rates
- +Decent QC
Cons
- −Smaller catalog than international peers
- −Higher pricing
CanLab Peptides
Canada · est. ~2020
Pros
- +Canadian domestic option
- +Good COA transparency for the region
Cons
- −Smaller catalog
- −Higher pricing than US peers
Loti Labs
United States · est. ~2018
Pros
- +Specialty in GH-stack peptides (CJC/Ipa/Tesa) and HGH research compounds
- +Decent batch documentation
Cons
- −Catalog narrower outside GH category
- −Card payments intermittent
Empower Pharmacy
United States (Rx) · est. ~2009
Pros
- +503B FDA-registered compounding outsourcing facility
- +Full pharma-grade QC
- +Used by major telehealth providers
Cons
- −Requires a prescription (telehealth or in-person)
- −Not a 'research vendor' — operates as a pharmacy
Henry Meds
United States (Telehealth) · est. ~2022
Pros
- +Legitimate telehealth Rx for compounded semaglutide / tirzepatide
- +Ships pharma-grade compounded peptide
- +Subscription pricing predictable
Cons
- −Requires telehealth visit + Rx
- −Compounded GLP-1 future regulatory landscape uncertain
Mochi Health
United States (Telehealth) · est. ~2022
Pros
- +Telehealth GLP-1 Rx with personalized clinician matching
- +Compounded peptide via licensed pharmacies
- +Insurance-friendly path when applicable
Cons
- −Telehealth visit + Rx required
- −Compounded peptide regulatory uncertainty
Vendor due-diligence checklist
- Always request a third-party HPLC/MS COA for the exact lot number you receive.
- Compare COA mass match to the expected molecular weight of the peptide.
- For sterile injection use, confirm endotoxin and sterility testing.
- Inspect packaging on receipt — cracked vials, no fill volume, or warm shipping = reject.
- Cross-reference vendor reputation across at least two independent communities before ordering.
Disclosure: Some links on this page may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission on purchases made through them, at no additional cost to you. Sponsored placements are clearly labeled. Brands marked “First-party” are owned and operated by Peply Labs. Our reputation rankings are editorial and held to the same standard for first-party and third-party vendors alike.